中圖網小程序
一鍵登錄
更方便
本類五星書更多>
-
>
闖進數學世界――探秘歷史名題
-
>
中醫基礎理論
-
>
當代中國政府與政治(新編21世紀公共管理系列教材)
-
>
高校軍事課教程
-
>
思想道德與法治(2021年版)
-
>
毛澤東思想和中國特色社會主義理論體系概論(2021年版)
-
>
中醫內科學·全國中醫藥行業高等教育“十四五”規劃教材
《都柏林人》的全景式社會思維 版權信息
- ISBN：9787302591139
- 條形碼：9787302591139 ; 978-7-302-59113-9
- 裝幀：70g輕型紙
- 冊數：暫無
- 重量：暫無
- 所屬分類：>
《都柏林人》的全景式社會思維 本書特色
本書首先探討了開篇《姊妹們》，認為其顯露出小說集的社會思維狀況；確立了顯性與隱性社會思維；*后分析了末篇《死者》，指出其為小說集的社會思維起到了收尾作用。本書適合對語言、文學與認知界面研究感興趣的研究生與科研人員閱讀，也適合熱衷于《都柏林人》的讀者閱讀。
《都柏林人》的全景式社會思維 內容簡介
本書運用認知敘事學領域中的社會思維理論，探討《都柏林人》小說集中的人物思維互動。本書首先探討了開篇《姊妹們》，認為其顯露出小說集的社會思維狀況；其次，本書確立了顯性與隱性社會思維；很后分析了末篇《死者》，指出其為小說集的社會思維起到了收尾作用。本書聚焦思維互動，通過文本細致分析，充分展現了都柏林人群體癱瘓精神，深入挖掘了癱瘓這一主題的根源，展現了全景式社會思維。 本書適合對語言、文學與認知界面研究感興趣的研究生與科研人員閱讀，也適合熱 衷于《都柏林人》的讀者閱讀。
《都柏林人》的全景式社會思維 目錄
Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Previous Research on Dubliners and
Fictional Social Minds
2．1 General Criticisms on Dubliners
2．1．1 The Early Period
2．1．2 The Transitional Period
2．1．3 The Later Period
2．2 Research on Minds in Dubliners
2．2．1 The Textual Approach
2．2．2 The Contextual Approach
2．3 Narratological Approaches to Fictional Minds
2．3．1 The Traditional Narratological Approach
2．3．2 The Cognitive Narratological Approach
2．4 Research on Social Minds in Fictions
Chapter 3 Social Mind Theory and Analytical Framework
3．1 The Social Nature of Mind
3．2 The Social Mind Theory
3．2．1 Palmer's Response to Classical Methodologies
3．2．2 The Centrality of Mind
3．2．3 The Social Mind in Action
3．3 Introducing the Social Mind Theory into Dubliners
3．3．1 Applicability of the Social Mind Theory in Dubliners
3．3．2 Improvement on the Social Mind Theory for Dubliners
3．4 An Analytical Framework
Chapter 4 The Social Minds in "The Sisters"： An Exposure
4．1 The Opening： The Boy's Publicly Engaged Mind
4．2 The Boy's Relationship with the Secular Adults
4．2．1 Unreadability of the Male Adults’ Mind
4．2．2 The Boy's Dramaturgical Action
4．2．3 Unreadability of the Female Adults’ Mind
4．2．4 The Boy's "Disappearance
4．2．5 Inescapability from the Secular World
4．3 The Boy's Relationship with Father Flynn
4．3．1 Attributional Difficulty
4．3．2 Inescapability from the Religious World
4．4 Interpretative Uncertainty
4．5 Summary
Chapter 5 The Overt Social Minds
5．1 Tacit Complicity in "The Boarding House
5．1．1 Communal Thought on Mrs． Mooney， Jack and Polly
5．1．2 Intermental Thought： Tacit Complicity between Mother
and Daughter
5．1．3 Ideology： Tacit Co mplicity a mong Ideological Forces
5．2 Open Complicity in "Grace
5．2．1 Foregrounded Communal Perception and Thought
5．2．2 Intermental Thought： Open Complicity
5．2．3 Ideology： Open Complicity between the Church
and the Mammon
5．3 Political Anosognosia in "Ivy Day in the Committee Room
5．3．1 The Opening： "Allegory of the Cave
5．3．2 Hynes' Debut： Failed Enlightenment
5．3．3 No Alcohol Served： Unmasking the Political Anosognosia
5．3．4 Alcohol Served： Fortifying the Political Anosognosia
5．4 Summary
Chapter 6 The Covert Social Minds
6．1 Group Servility
6．1．1 Group Servility to the Colonialism
6．1．2 Group Servility to the Church
6．1．3 Females’ Group Servility to the Patriarchy
6．2 Group Self-Unknowing
6．2．1 Group Self-Deception
6．2．2 Group Anosognosia
6．3 Group Isolation
6．3．1 Individuals against Crowds
6．3．2 Group Self-Division
6．4 Summary
Chapter 7 The Social Minds in "The Dead"： A Closure
7．1 The Dublin Bourgeois Communal Thought
7．1．1 Communal Thought： Bourgeois Pretentiousness
7．1．2 Communal Thought： Bourgeois Hypocrisy
7．2 Gabriel's Encounters with Three Females
7．2．1 Gabriel's Encounter with Lily
7．2．2 Gabriel's Encounter with Miss Ivors
7．2．3 Gabriel's Encounter with Gretta
7．3 The Ending： Gabriel's Epiphany
7．4 Summary
Chapter 8 Conclusion
Bibliography
Appendix A Synopses of the Fifteen Stories in Dubliners
Appendix B Composition Time of the Dubliners Stories
展開全部
《都柏林人》的全景式社會思維 節選
In his review of traditional narratology，Palmer finds out that the traditional narratological approach to fictional minds （Bal，1997； Chatman，1978； Cohn，1978； Fludernik，1993； Lodge，2002） takes the internalist perspective to capture only part of the fictional minds because of its undue emphasis on the inner，introspective，private，solitary，and individual mind （2010： 39）. As a result，this internalist perspective is preoccupied with such concepts as direct thought，free indirect thought，stream of consaousness，and interior monologue，etc. that Palmer dubs the "speech category approach" （see Section 2.3.1，Chapter 2）. Palmer points out that since the speech category approach "is concerned primarily with part of the mind known as inner speech，the highly verbalized flow of self-conscious thought" （2004： 53），it neglects the other parts of the mind such as feelings，desires，beliefs，intentions，dispositions and emotions，and consequently，fails to give a full account of the social aspects of the mental processes. In his own remarks，"In my view，the position is very simple： sometimes thought is highly verbalized and can accurately be described as inner speech； sometimes it is not and so cannot"（65） Of the three modes of thought presentation： direct thought，thought report and free indirect thought，Palmer analyzes their functions of presenting the areas of the mind. He ranks them according to their degrees of presenting mind： thought report apt for all areas of the mind，including inner speech，free indirect thought apt for inner speech and some other areas of the mind，and direct thought apt only for inner speech （56）. Based on this discovery，Palmer points out that the speech category approach privileges the mimetic categories of direct thought and free indirect thought，conveying individual and private minds over the diegetic category of thought report which renders "such states of mind as emotions，sensations，dispositions，beliefs，attitudes，intentions，motives，and reason for action" （13）. He argues that thought report is the versatile technique in that it can summarize inner speech and present it as mental action （56）. Therefore，Palmer puts the mode of thought report "at the center of the presentations by narrators to readers of the contents of fictionalminds in their social and physical contexts" （76）. He further suggests that as against the speech category approach，his new approach is "toward narrators' presentations of the whole mind that focuses on both states of mind and inner speech and that acknowledges the indispensable and pivotal role of thought report in linking individual mental functioning to its social context" （ibid.）.The narrator，treated as intrusive or distorting in the speech category approach，is taken to assume a "linking function" （ibid.） by situating the characters' minds within their physical and soaal context. Thus，Palmer "rehabilitated thoughtreport […] as a sophisticated and flexible technique for the representation of fictional consciousness" （Keen，2011： 358） because it "is ideally suited to informative presentations of the purposive and directive nature of thought as well as its social nature" （Palmer，2004： 76），and "is the norm because the linking function is such a vital contribution to what can plausibly be described as the purpose of the novel： the exploration of the relationship between indMduals and the soaeties within which they live" （78）.In addition to the speech category approach，story analysis，the concept of focalization，and characterization theory as the other classical methodologies "do not add up to a complete and coherent study of all aspects of the minds of characters in novels" （Palmer，2010： 8），either.Palmer subsumes such branch of narrative theory by structuralists as narrative grammar，narrative structures，the analysis of story，the functional classification of action sequences under the rubric of "story analysis" （2004：28），in which structuralist theorists define characters as functions （Propp，1968），or as actants （Bremond，1973； Greimas，1983； Todorov，1977）. Palmer points out that story analysis based on characters as actants of fixed functions is "at a very high level of abstraction" （2004： 29）. Herman also questions the structuralist narratologists' view of characters as "regularly recurring，typifiable 'participants' in the syntagmatic unfolding of the narrated action" （1999： 233-234）. Thus，if a character is regarded as someone who can think，feel，believe，desire，including all sorts of mental activities，the structuralist narratologists'view precludes any mental activity a character can be entitled to. In Palmer's words，"if the ways in which characters are constructed by readers are to be fully understood，they have to be regarded as fictional beings that are related to world view and time-space in a fuller and more holistic manner than story analysis envisages" （2004： 30）. In addition，Palmer also pinpoints the limited use of the concept of action by story analysis. He argues that "The analysis of narrative structures is clearly dependent on a good deal of indirect inference about fictional minds through examinations of the function and significance of the physical actions caused by those minds" （ibid.）. In this sense，the scope of study on fictional minds is extended from direct reference to mental states toactions caused by those mental states. Therefore，the study on fictional minds is concerned with the characters' fictional minds. In turn，the concept of event in story analysis is targeted by Palmer，who strongly argues that "Events only have significance if they are experienced by actors" （ibid.）. ……
《都柏林人》的全景式社會思維 作者簡介
張之俊，清華大學外國語言文學博士，現為中國地質大學（北京）外國語學院教師，主要研究領域為認知敘事學與喬伊斯作品研究，發表本領域CSSCI來源期刊研究論文,主持與參與各級項目十余項。兩次獲得國家留學基金委資助分別在美國和英國高校做訪問學者。曾獲得2010年北京市高等教育學會研究生英語教學研究分會第二屆青年教師基本功比賽特等獎，2018年 第九屆“外教社杯”全國高校外語教學大賽（英語類專業組）北京賽區英語專業組一等獎。
書友推薦
- >
苦雨齋序跋文-周作人自編集
- >
唐代進士錄
- >
月亮虎
- >
上帝之肋:男人的真實旅程
- >
李白與唐代文化
- >
朝聞道
- >
企鵝口袋書系列·偉大的思想20:論自然選擇(英漢雙語)
- >
自卑與超越
本類暢銷
