掃一掃
關注中圖網
官方微博
外國文學研究文庫莎士比亞與生態批評理論/外國文學研究文庫第3輯 版權信息
- ISBN：9787521320503
- 條形碼：9787521320503 ; 978-7-5213-2050-3
- 裝幀：一般膠版紙
- 冊數：暫無
- 重量：暫無
- 所屬分類：>
外國文學研究文庫莎士比亞與生態批評理論/外國文學研究文庫第3輯 本書特色
適讀人群 ：學生,教師,一般讀者《莎士比亞與生態批評理論》是“外國文學研究文庫”系列第三輯的一本。該系列旨在將國外的文學學界的學術成果及時引進和介紹給我國外國文學學者、學生及愛好者，反映外國文學研究領域在世界范圍的發展趨勢與前沿探索。 “外國文學研究文庫”英文書以原版的形式、非英文書以譯本的形式出版，并輔之以國內這一領域的資深學者撰寫的導讀，幫助讀者把握作品的脈絡，掌握其思想要點，更全面、更深入地理解作品要義。
外國文學研究文庫莎士比亞與生態批評理論/外國文學研究文庫第3輯 內容簡介
自21世紀初，生態批評的逐漸興起體現了人們在面對生態問題時的深刻反思：我們（人類）錯了嗎？我們錯在哪里？我們什么時候開始錯的？我們應該怎么辦？ 《莎士比亞與生態批評理論/外國文學研究文庫·第三輯》將問題的源頭定在了啟蒙運動，思考了啟蒙時代之前，英國文藝復興的產物——莎士比亞戲劇如何勾勒人與自然、人與其他生物的關系，如何呈現人在地球上及宇宙中的位置，以及如何構建人與人、人與社群的關系。
外國文學研究文庫莎士比亞與生態批評理論/外國文學研究文庫第3輯 目錄
Introduction： Done and Undone
1 The Rise of Ecocriticism
2 Shakespeare and the Meaning of 'Life' in the Twenty-first Century
3 Animals in Shakespearian Ecocriticism
4 Crowds and Social Networks in
Shakespeare
Conclusion
Notes
Bibliography
Index
1 The Rise of Ecocriticism
2 Shakespeare and the Meaning of 'Life' in the Twenty-first Century
3 Animals in Shakespearian Ecocriticism
4 Crowds and Social Networks in
Shakespeare
Conclusion
Notes
Bibliography
Index
展開全部
外國文學研究文庫莎士比亞與生態批評理論/外國文學研究文庫第3輯 節選
《莎士比亞與生態批評理論/外國文學研究文庫·第三輯》： Questions of textual corruption （which the 1609 quarto shows）， and sexual corruption （which the play of Pericles is much concerned with）， can be interrelated in critical works. Wendy Wall studies the diagrams of lineal descent， called stemmata， that are used by bibliographers to represent the relationships between early texts， and she finds them rather like the lines of familial descent used to represent family trees in the study of genealogy. In both， Wall detects a patriarchal fixation that obscures the complex relationships of text and sex that cut across these lines.26 In fact Wall is wrong to deride bibliographical stemmata on these grounds， since the relationships between early printed editions of plays really can be thought about in genetic terms. The reason for this is that most commonly a reprint of a play （say， Q2） was made by using an exemplar of the previous edition （say， Q1） as the printer's copy text. Wall is wrong to think that such lines of descent are patrilineal and suppress the matrilineal possibilities， for in fact there really is only one ancestor text （not two） for each descendant. That is， printed editions are made by something like mitosis （cloning） of the parent rather than by meiosis （sexual cell division）. Meiosis， sexual reproduction， is a rather better metaphor for the reproductive creativity that happens in authors' minds， as described by Richard II in prison. Meiosis is what happens when Gower's creativity， fertilized by his sources-'mine Authors'-including Godfrey of Viterbo （c. 1120 to c. 1196）， was， in the minds of Wilkins and Shakespeare， combined with material from Laurence Twine's Pattern of Painful Adventures （1594）， which itself took material from the widely circulating collection of stories Gesta Romanorum from the late thirteenth and early fourteenth centuries. In the bibliographical stemmata of Shakespeare editions， a single text stands at the head of the monogenetic line of descent， and， by contrast， medieval works are more properly conceived as polygenetic， because the earliest versions are almost always multiple semi-independent manuscripts. In Shakespeare's time， however， Gower's reputation was that of standing alongside Chaucer at the creative head of the entire tradition of English Literature. As Philip Sidney puts it， '[first] wer Gower， and Chawcer， after whom， encouraged & delighted with their excellent foregoing， others haue folowed to bewtify our mother toong'. Of the two， Chaucer's reputation was arguably a little less secure than Gower's， as Ann Thompson shows， but importantly for our purposes Shakespeare only ever acknowledged as his artistic creditors this pair of literary predecessors. Shakespeare's debt to Gower is marked by his appearance in Pericles， and his debt to Chaucer by the prologue's notably sexualized reference to him as the work's 'noble breeder' in The Two Noble Kinsmen （Prologue， 10）. The recurrence of sexual imagery of artistic fertilization in Shakespeare's collaborative work gives credence to Masten's general claim that collaborative writing excited consciously and unconsciously sexualized descriptions， but it would be a mistake to think that the emergent concerns of singular authorship' were simply aligned with heterocentrism. In Shakespeare the contrast is clearly between solitary self-division of the faculties-making the brain female to the soul， in Richard IT's soliloquy-by which artistic conception remains monogenetic， and collaboration as a division of labour that in making the work polygenetic risks reducing the dramatist to a mere conduit for another's words and ideas. The abhorrence of incest at the start of Pericles， and the dramatization of its avoidance at the end， we can read as necessary self-justifications for a new way of working that Shakespeare adopted in his forties in order to appropriate 'the juice'， as Gary Taylor calls it， of younger， more successful men. ……
外國文學研究文庫莎士比亞與生態批評理論/外國文學研究文庫第3輯 作者簡介
作者，加布里埃爾·伊根（Gabriel Egan）是英國德蒙福特大學的莎士比亞研究教授和文本研究中心主任，撰有多部有關莎士比亞和生態批評方面的著作。 主編，金莉：北京外國語大學教授、博導，文學博士。研究領域為美國小說與美國女性文學。目前擔任北外王佐良外國文學高等研究院院長和《外國文學》雜志主編。主要著作包括《文學女性與女性文學》《20世紀美國女性小說研究》《當代美國女權文學批評家研究》，并發表論文多篇。
書友推薦
- >
【精裝繪本】畫給孩子的中國神話
- >
名家帶你讀魯迅:故事新編
- >
詩經-先民的歌唱
- >
人文閱讀與收藏·良友文學叢書:一天的工作
- >
苦雨齋序跋文-周作人自編集
- >
史學評論
- >
龍榆生：詞曲概論/大家小書
- >
姑媽的寶刀
本類暢銷
