掃一掃
關(guān)注中圖網(wǎng)
官方微博
本類五星書更多>
-
>
百年孤獨(2025版)
-
>
易中天“品讀中國”系列(珍藏版全四冊)
-
>
心歸何處
-
>
(精裝)羅馬三巨頭
-
>
野菊花
-
>
梁啟超家書
-
>
我的父親母親:民國大家筆下的父母
莎氏喜劇和瓊生喜劇:《威尼斯商人》與《狐貍》比較研究(社版) 版權(quán)信息
- ISBN：9787569014891
- 條形碼：9787569014891 ; 978-7-5690-1489-1
- 裝幀：一般膠版紙
- 冊數(shù)：暫無
- 重量：暫無
- 所屬分類：>
莎氏喜劇和瓊生喜劇:《威尼斯商人》與《狐貍》比較研究(社版) 內(nèi)容簡介
歷史一度認(rèn)為，莎翁喜劇流暢、浪漫、祥和、喜聞樂見、重娛樂而輕教化，瓊生喜劇則呆板、陰冷、譏諷、書卷氣重、重教化而輕娛樂。直至近百年來，此類對立觀點才開始改變。 《莎氏喜劇和瓊生喜劇：與比較研究（英文版）》從貪婪主題、教化意圖、人物塑造三點比較了莎翁的《威尼斯商人》和瓊生的《老狐貍》，認(rèn)為上述傳統(tǒng)觀點過于簡略，未能充分反映劇作家的喜劇全貌。 《莎氏喜劇和瓊生喜劇：與比較研究（英文版）》的結(jié)論是，兩人的技巧、意圖可能極似。二者確有不同，但并非以往過簡、過略的觀點所能描述。
莎氏喜劇和瓊生喜劇:《威尼斯商人》與《狐貍》比較研究(社版) 目錄
序言
PREFACE
Introduction
1 Shakespearian and Jonsonian Comedy
I． A general view of Shakespearian and Jonsonian comedy
II． Shakespeare and Jonson in dramatic context
III． Shakespeare and Jonson in historical context
IV． The "rub" of generalization
2 The Theme of Avarice
I． Definition of avarice
II． Praise and prosecution of avarice
III． Historical background of avarice
3 Jonson's and Shakespeare's Dramatic Didacticism
I． Introduction
II． Jonson's didacticism
IH． Shakespeare's didacticism
4 Characterization in Volpone and The Merchant of Venice
I． Humors and character types
II． The fortune hunters
III． The facilitators
IV． The villains of passions
Conclusion
Works Cited
PREFACE
Introduction
1 Shakespearian and Jonsonian Comedy
I． A general view of Shakespearian and Jonsonian comedy
II． Shakespeare and Jonson in dramatic context
III． Shakespeare and Jonson in historical context
IV． The "rub" of generalization
2 The Theme of Avarice
I． Definition of avarice
II． Praise and prosecution of avarice
III． Historical background of avarice
3 Jonson's and Shakespeare's Dramatic Didacticism
I． Introduction
II． Jonson's didacticism
IH． Shakespeare's didacticism
4 Characterization in Volpone and The Merchant of Venice
I． Humors and character types
II． The fortune hunters
III． The facilitators
IV． The villains of passions
Conclusion
Works Cited
展開全部
莎氏喜劇和瓊生喜劇:《威尼斯商人》與《狐貍》比較研究(社版) 節(jié)選
《莎氏喜劇和瓊生喜劇：與比較研究（英文版）》： Scholars have noted the importance of Shakespeare's inheritance of the English popular traditions. A great and humane genius， humanist and outstanding writer， actor and theater owner， Shakespeare was able to combine different traditions and sources to produce his unique， inimitable comedies. Traditionally the main features of Shakespeare's comedies have been claimed to be their sweetness， concern with male/female relationships， popular appeal and the purpose of entertainment. Compared with Jonson， Shakespeare's use of classical techniques and materials was limited. Shakespeare's lack of classical education was seen to be the cause of his violations of the dramatic rules laid down by Greek and Roman writers and renewed by the English and French neo-classicists. . Compared with Shakespeare， Jonson was regarded as more influenced by classical comic traditions. A well-read scholar of the classics， court poet and humariist， Jonson learned from the Greek and Roman dramatists while absorbing the English tradition of morality plays. He particularly drew much on contemporary London life. Traditionally Jonson's comedies have been considered learned， humorous， satirical and didactic. Dissatisfied with the current practices in playwriting， Jonson created hunor comedies as a new genre based on his studies of classical literature and on his own literary theories. l3eing a drama theorist and critic himself， Jonson also produced comedies which deal with human follies aiming at warning against and correcting them. He was praised by both contemporary and future critics as a staunch observer of neo-classical dramatic rules. Shakespeare's and Jonson's techniques of characterization have been thought markedly different. Shakespeare's characters have been considered unique， natural individuals that can be found in all ages and all places. They are always alive. Jonson's characters， in contrast， were considered not as unique individuals， but as types， for example， a bragging soldier or an old miser. They were alive in the dramatist's London， but not in other ages or other places. Shakespeare was praised for his naturalness and spontaneity； Jonson was blamed for his mechanicality and labored contrivance. Shakespeare was hailed for his nature； and Jonson， his art. The past four hundred years have witnessed the vicissitudes of the reception of Shakespeare's and Jonson's comedies. From his death until almost the last quarter of the eighteenth century when neo-classical rules dominated the literary world， Shakespeare was largely criticized， extensively adapted and occasionally appreciated， while Jonson was avidly worshiped， carefully imitated and held up as the standard and culmination of dramatic comedy. The English Romantic movement radically changed this situation. With the new emphasis on " spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings" （Wordsworth 237）， Shakespeare found great favor with the Romantics， who brought Shakespeare to continued ascendancy. The Romantics' elevation of Shakespeare resulted in ignorance and even rejection of Jonson， and an even lower place for him was still to come in the late nineteenth century， when most of his plays， especially his earlier， well-recognized， great Jacobean comedies， were disregarded. Since the ……
莎氏喜劇和瓊生喜劇:《威尼斯商人》與《狐貍》比較研究(社版) 作者簡介
廖運剛，四川宜賓人。文學(xué)博士（2012，北京大學(xué)），四川大學(xué)外國語學(xué)院副教授，英國牛津大學(xué)英文系訪問學(xué)者（2015—2016）。主要研究興趣是英國文藝復(fù)興時期文學(xué)。
書友推薦
- >
回憶愛瑪儂
- >
莉莉和章魚
- >
企鵝口袋書系列·偉大的思想20:論自然選擇(英漢雙語)
- >
大紅狗在馬戲團(tuán)-大紅狗克里弗-助人
- >
新文學(xué)天穹兩巨星--魯迅與胡適/紅燭學(xué)術(shù)叢書(紅燭學(xué)術(shù)叢書)
- >
羅曼·羅蘭讀書隨筆-精裝
- >
月亮虎
- >
月亮與六便士
本類暢銷
