�Ї�(gu��)��Ժ��Ϣ���������u(p��ng)����(b��o)��:Ӣ�� ������ɫ

The Research Center for the State Rule of Law Index of the Institute of Law, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, and the project team of the Innovation Project of the Rule of Law Index, in their enduring preoccupation with the rule of law development and the judicial system operation and reform, have successively launched Rule of Law Evaluation Reports series, including Report on the Transparency Index of China Government, Report on the Transparency Index of China Justice, Report on the Transparency Index of China Procuratorial Work, Report on the Index of Justice in Sunshine at Zhejiang Courts, Report on the Index of Justice in Sunshine at Beijing Courts, and Report on the Transparency Index of China Higher Education, together with Evaluation Report on Basic Settlement of Enforcement Difficulties – Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court as a Sample, International Comparison on Judicial Transparency, and People’s Forum – Special Issue of Zhejiang Courts etc.
The Research Center for the State Rule of Law Index of the Institute of Law, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, and the project team of the Innovation Project of the Rule of Law Index, in their enduring preoccupation with the rule of law development and the judicial system operation and reform, have successively launched Rule of Law Evaluation Reports series, including Report on the Transparency Index of China Government, Report on the Transparency Index of China Justice, Report on the Transparency Index of China Procuratorial Work, Report on the Index of Justice in Sunshine at Zhejiang Courts, Report on the Index of Justice in Sunshine at Beijing Courts, and Report on the Transparency Index of China Higher Education, together with Evaluation Report on Basic Settlement of Enforcement Difficulties – Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court as a Sample, International Comparison on Judicial Transparency, and People’s Forum – Special Issue of Zhejiang Courts etc. A Third Party Evaluation Report on Informatization of Courts in China is the first of its kind in China to have conducted a third party evaluation on the development, effect and implementation of informatization of courts. It has been shown as in the result of investigation that Version 2.0 informatization of the people’s courts has been basically accomplished with interconnection and interoperability as its major characteristics; remarkable achievements have been made in such areas of endeavor as serving the people, improving trial quality and efficiency, reinforcing judicial enforcement, promoting judicial openness, boosting judicial reform, and implementing big data. Currently, as China courts are striving to construct court informatization Version 3.0, painstaking efforts ought to be devoted to renewal of mind, top-level design, business convergence, improvement of capability, and team construction for better service of the people, of trials and enforcement and of judicial management.